Vote to Review
Beats Studio Pro

Beats Studio Pro

The Studio Pro is the first Beats I'd recommend on sound alone

A surprisingly balanced tuning, USB-C lossless via an internal DAC, and Apple ecosystem perks at $349. The ear cups are small, the ANC is just okay, and a chunk of buyers will be uncomfortable before they hear it.

7.6

The good

  • MDAQS 4.8 sound — best-in-category for closed-back
  • USB-C lossless audio via internal DAC (rare for Beats)
  • Apple Spatial Audio + Find My + fast-pairing
  • 31h ANC battery; 10 min charge = 4 hours
  • $349 — value pricing vs. AirPods Max

The less good

  • Small ear cups (59×40mm) cause fit issues
  • No aptX/LDAC — Bluetooth limited to SBC/AAC
  • No multipoint, no H1/H2 chip
  • Disappointing microphone noise rejection
  • Cheap-feeling plastic construction

I have spent ten years assuming Beats sounded like a punch in the face, because that is what Beats sounded like ten years ago. The Studio Pro is the first pair where I put them on, played a familiar acoustic track, and stopped to check that the EQ was flat. It was. The bass is present but not bloated, the vocals sit forward, and there is a little extra brightness above 5kHz that occasionally turns a cymbal into a hiss but mostly just sounds detailed. This is a real headphone now.

The other genuine surprise is USB-C lossless audio through an internal DAC. Beats has historically been a Bluetooth-only product, and a Bluetooth-only product with no aptX or LDAC at that. Plugging these into my laptop and getting bit-perfect playback feels like a feature Apple snuck in past the marketing team. On well-mastered acoustic and jazz it makes a difference I can hear, and over the course of a long writing session I started using the cable on purpose.

The Apple ecosystem perks are also real. Find My works the way it does on the AirPods Max, fast-pairing is one tap on iOS and one tap on Android, and Spatial Audio with a movie at night is genuinely fun. None of this is groundbreaking in 2026, but for $349 it is more ecosystem than the price suggests.

The problem, and it is the kind of problem that will end the conversation for some people in a store, is the fit. The ear cups measure roughly 59 by 40 millimeters, which is smaller than the AirPods Max, smaller than the Sony XM5, smaller than my own ears. After about an hour my ears start to fold in on themselves, and the thin headband padding presses on the top of my skull in a way that the AirPods Max never does. If you have small ears and a narrow head these will be fine; if you do not, no amount of sound quality will rescue you.

The ANC is good enough, not great. It cuts the worst of an office HVAC and most of an Uber, but it is visibly behind a Bose QC Ultra and noticeably behind a Sony XM5 when the noise gets serious. The microphone is the genuinely weak spot — I took a call from a busy sidewalk and the other person asked me twice to repeat myself before I gave up and pulled out my phone. The physical buttons click loudly enough that I can hear my own thumb in my ears, which is a small thing that becomes annoying within a week.

The build is the part that gives away the price. The plastic feels light in a cheap way, not in a deliberate way, and after three weeks of normal carry there are already two fingernail marks near the hinge. The Studio Pro will not age like the AirPods Max ages. It will age like a $349 plastic headphone ages.

Verdict: Buy these if you have small ears, live around Apple devices, and want USB-C lossless without paying flagship money. If you wear glasses or have an average-or-larger head, try the Sennheiser Momentum 4 instead.

What should we review next?

Suggest a product or vote on existing suggestions.

Go to voting →